David Wall wrote:
> If I have various record types that are "one up" records that are
> structurally similar (same columns) and are mostly retrieved one at a
> time by its primary key, is there any performance or operational benefit
> to having millions of such records split across multiple tables
If I have various record types that are "one up" records that are
structurally similar (same columns) and are mostly retrieved one at a
time by its primary key, is there any performance or operational benefit
to having millions of such records split across multiple tables (say by
their applicat
