I would just like to add my voice to those praising the community
support provided by this list.
I am not a DBA, and merely tinker with a few databases, mostly on the
web. As such, my questions have occasionally bordered on the very
silly, but I have always had them answered courteously, helpfully
On Friday 24. June 2011 06.01.31 Greg Smith wrote:
> The idea that PostgreSQL is reverse engineered from Oracle is
> ridiculous.
Maybe he believes that SQL was invented by Oracle?
regards, Leif
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscr
Le jeudi 23 juin 2011 à 18:14 -0700, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet a écrit :
> Here:
>
> http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgresql.html
>
> Any comments?
>
There is a previous post by the same author :
http://craigglendenning.blogspot.com/2009/03/i-fight-to-stay-
On Friday 24. June 2011 03.14.39 Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
> Here:
>
> http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgresq
> l.html
>
> Any comments?
I think he got a point in «Oracle as the second largest software company in
the world» which is a killer argument
On 06/23/2011 10:28 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
I love how he finishes with the claim that Oracle "keep their finger on
the pulse of where IT is headed", right after admitting that their
client is actually a huge piece of junk.
Oracle is able to keep their finger on the pulse of their customer
I love how he finishes with the claim that Oracle "keep their finger on
the pulse
presumably, he means, the jugular ...
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgres
Stephen Frost wrote:
> I love how he finishes with the claim that Oracle "keep their finger on
> the pulse of where IT is headed", right after admitting that their
> client is actually a huge piece of junk.
I guess that was just a typo.
Shouldn't it read "[Oracle can] keep their fingers on the thr
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet
wrote:
> Here:
>
> http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgresql.html
>
> Any comments?
That is quite possibly one of the most ignorant opinion pieces I've
ever read. The janitor in Dilbert is significantly
> On 06/24/2011 09:14 AM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
> I'm quite surprised the article didn't mention the importance of having
> "somebody to sue if it goes wrong", which is a comment I often see made
> re Oracle. It's lucky they didn't try to stress that point, because
> evidence of succes
This message has been digitally signed by the sender.
Re___GENERAL__Oracle___PostgreSQL_comparison___.eml
Description: Binary data
Hi-Tech Gears Ltd, Gurgaon, India
Sent using "PostMaster" by QuantumLink Communications
Get your fre
> > http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgre
> > sql.html
> >
> > Any comments?
>
> Amusing.
>
> "
> What kind of support is available if we have a problem? What is their
> patching schedule to address exploits and known security defects? If
> there is a bug, h
On 06/24/2011 09:14 AM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet wrote:
Here:
http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgresql.html
Any comments?
He's been working with Oracle too long, and forgotten that it's a
database not a career and a lifestyle?
More seriously: it's all a
On 06/23/2011 10:28 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Next, PG doesn't even use the same basic technology as Oracle regarding
how transaction isolation and versioning works. Oracle using rollback
segments to store 'old' rows in, while PG uses a Multi-Version
Concurrency Control (MVCC) system. They're fu
> http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgresql.html
>
> Any comments?
Amusing.
"
What kind of support is available if we have a problem? What is their
patching schedule to address exploits and known security defects? If
there is a bug, how responsive is the organi
* Rodrigo E. De León Plicet (rdele...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Any comments?
Sure, they've never bothered to actually look at the data. Consider
that for quite a while Oracle essentially refused to admit that their
could *possibly* be bugs in their system (see: Unbreakable Linux, or
whatever that fool
Here:
http://cglendenningoracle.blogspot.com/2011/06/oracle-vs-postgres-postgresql.html
Any comments?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
16 matches
Mail list logo
