Hi,
The link[1] for the development snapshots of pg-admin as advertised
here [2] seems to be broken. Are these snapshots hosted somewhere
else these days or are they no longer produced. I have a colleague
who's bravely switching from SQL Server to Postgresql who'd really
like to use the new
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:01 -0400, Andy Chambers wrote:
[...]
The link[1] for the development snapshots of pg-admin as advertised
here [2] seems to be broken. Are these snapshots hosted somewhere
else these days or are they no longer produced.
They are no longer produced. I'll fix the
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:01 -0400, Andy Chambers wrote:
[...]
The link[1] for the development snapshots of pg-admin as advertised
here [2] seems to be broken. Are these snapshots hosted somewhere
else
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 17:17 -0400, Andy Chambers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
guilla...@lelarge.info wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:01 -0400, Andy Chambers wrote:
[...]
The link[1] for the development snapshots of pg-admin as advertised
here [2]
Bob Pawley wrote:
Can anyone tell me why a table developed through the PG Admin
interface isn't found by SQL when accessing it through the SQL interface??
Bob Pawley
1) Are you sure you are connecting to the same database?
2) What kind of SQL interface you are using?
Andrei.
Can anyone tell me why a table developed through the PG Admin interface isn't
found by SQL when accessing it through the SQL interface??
Bob Pawley
On 31/07/2007 16:55, Bob Pawley wrote:
Can anyone tell me why a table developed through the PG Admin interface
isn't found by SQL when accessing it through the SQL interface??
Hi Bob,
No reason that I can think ofcan you describe *IN DETAIL* the steps
you followed and the result?
Ray.
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 Bob Pawley's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote:
Can anyone tell me why a table developed through the PG Admin interface
isn't found by SQL when accessing it through the SQL interface??
Maybe it is a problem of case-sensitive names? Check in the table definition
of
On 7/31/07, Bob Pawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me why a table developed through the PG Admin interface
isn't found by SQL when accessing it through the SQL interface??
Bob Pawley
likely issues:
in the wrong schema
in the wrong database
in the wrong host :-)
merlin
To: Berend Tober
Cc: pgsql general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
I am talking about designing the control system.
No one makes a perfect design at first go. Devices are deleted and
others
added. Until the end of the design stage the numbers need to be
sequential
with no gaps. After the design
On 12/4/06, Bob Pawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be sequential.
If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate to again become
sequential and
On 12/4/06, Bob Pawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be
sequential.
If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate to again
become
sequential
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
Bob Pawley wrote:
That's what they are doing.
That is also what I am looking for, if it is accessable. If so, I can use
that information to add a sequential numerical element to my information
that doesn't have
Bob Pawley wrote:
This is basically what I have done. However it is not particularly
stable and is inelegant.
The serial number is close to what I need except it becomes tied to the
information.
The row numbering on the PG Admin version 1.6.1 performs the same
operation that I am looking
Bob Pawley wrote:
I'm sure that PG Admin just generates the numbers in the GUI as it
displays them (as they're meaningless as persistent data).
Perhaps - but they aren't necessarily meaningless as pure information.
Can't you just do the same - generate the numbers within your
application -
PROTECTED]
Cc: Steve Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PgSQL General
pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
Bob Pawley wrote:
I'm sure that PG Admin just generates the numbers in the GUI as it
displays them (as they're meaningless as persistent
Bob Pawley wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be
sequential. If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate
to again become sequential and gapless.
How many control
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:55:35AM -0800, Bob Pawley wrote:
Perhaps I can - it will be learning curve for me. However, the development
would be so much easier to apply if it were available in PostgreSQL in a
form similar to generating a serial column.
Your assertion that it would be easy is
I just installed PostgreSQL 8.1 and PG Admin 1.6.1 .
These versions have a sequential column, that is not part of the table,
identifying the rows.
Is there any method of accessing those numbers and identifying them with
elements within the table??
Bob Pawley
Bob Pawley wrote:
I just installed PostgreSQL 8.1 and PG Admin 1.6.1 .
These versions have a sequential column, that is not part of the
table, identifying the rows.
Is there any method of accessing those numbers and identifying them
with elements within the table??
Are you sure it's not just
@archonet.com
To: Bob Pawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Postgresql pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
Bob Pawley wrote:
I just installed PostgreSQL 8.1 and PG Admin 1.6.1 .
These versions have a sequential column, that is not part
Bob Pawley wrote:
That's what they are doing.
That is also what I am looking for, if it is accessable. If so, I can
use that information to add a sequential numerical element to my
information that doesn't have the restrictions of a serial column.
Bob
Hi Bob,
Well, if you create your
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
Bob Pawley wrote:
That's what they are doing.
That is also what I am looking for, if it is accessable. If so, I can use
that information to add a sequential numerical element to my information
that doesn't have the restrictions of a serial column.
Bob
Hi Bob
On 4 Dec 2006 at 15:40, Bob Pawley wrote:
When a row is deleted the serial number and oid are also deleted. The
sequence then has gaps which are inadmissible.
This is an issue which has come up at various times on this list in
the past - it may be worth having a look through the archives.
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 17:53, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 4 Dec 2006 at 15:40, Bob Pawley wrote:
When a row is deleted the serial number and oid are also deleted. The
sequence then has gaps which are inadmissible.
This is an issue which has come up at various times on this list in
the
- perhaps.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Raymond O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
On 4 Dec 2006 at 15:40, Bob Pawley wrote:
When a row is deleted the serial number and oid are also
-
From: Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Raymond O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql general pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 17:53, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 4 Dec 2006 at 15:40, Bob Pawley wrote
On Dec 4, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 4 Dec 2006 at 15:40, Bob Pawley wrote:
When a row is deleted the serial number and oid are also deleted. The
sequence then has gaps which are inadmissible.
This is an issue which has come up at various times on this list in
the past -
Perhaps - but they aren't necessarily meaningless as pure information.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Steve Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PgSQL General pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
On Dec 4, 2006, at 3:53 PM
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be sequential.
If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate to again become
sequential and gapless.
Is it a bill of material line
Bob Pawley wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be
sequential. If the user deletes a device the numbers need to
regenerate to again become sequential and gapless.
Could you explain
On Monday 04 December 2006 04:17 pm, Bob Pawley wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be sequential.
If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate to again become
: [GENERAL] PG Admin
Bob Pawley wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be
sequential. If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate
to again become sequential and gapless.
Could
- Original Message -
From: Berend Tober [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Pawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql general pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin
Bob Pawley wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design
On Dec 5, 2006, at 13:08 , Bob Pawley wrote:
The physical devices don't get numbered until the design is
established and stable. This is known as the construction stage.
I guess I would set up a couple of tables to track this ordering
independently of the devices themselves. Rough schema:
Bob Pawley wrote:
Your missing the point.
I am creating a design system for industrial control.
The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be
sequential. If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate
to again become sequential and gapless.
How many control
I am a new user for Pg-admin and i just inatlled it on Linux and i need
to connect it on server but their is error that comes up to me which is:
Is server running on host and accepting TCP connection on the port 5432
Thanks,
mary
---(end of
Mary Adel schrieb:
I am a new user for Pg-admin and i just inatlled it on Linux and i need
to connect it on server but their is error that comes up to me which is:
Is server running on host and accepting TCP connection on the port 5432
Which part of that message dont you understand?
Make
Assad Jarrahian wrote:
Environment: Deployed on Debian. Test and Development on Windows.
Using pg_admin III and Postgresql 8.1 (both test and development).
I want to backup Development and restore it in test and vice-versa.
So when I do a backup of the db (in PGAdmin III), it backs it up. But
Environment: Deployed on Debian. Test and Development on Windows.
Using pg_admin III and Postgresql 8.1 (both test and development).
I want to backup Development and restore it in test and vice-versa.
So when I do a backup of the db (in PGAdmin III), it backs it up. But
when I restore it, all
40 matches
Mail list logo
