Re: [GENERAL] PG wire protocol question

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > 2016-05-17 15:29 keltezéssel, Albe Laurenz írta: >> >> Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: >>> >>> it was a long time I have read this list or written to it. >>> >>> Now, I have a question. This blog post was written about 3 years

Re: [GENERAL] PG wire protocol question

2016-05-17 15:29 keltezéssel, Albe Laurenz írta: Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: it was a long time I have read this list or written to it. Now, I have a question. This blog post was written about 3 years ago: https://aphyr.com/posts/282-jepsen-postgres Basically, it talks about the client AND the

Re: [GENERAL] PG wire protocol question

On Sat, 14 May 2016 21:58:48 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: >Hi, > >it was a long time I have read this list or written to it. > >Now, I have a question. This blog post was written about 3 years ago: >https://aphyr.com/posts/282-jepsen-postgres > >Basically, it talks about the

Re: [GENERAL] PG wire protocol question

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote: > That blog post seems ill-informed - that has nothing to do with > two-phase commit. > > The problem - that the server may commit a transaction, but the client > never receives the server's response - is independent of

Re: [GENERAL] PG wire protocol question

Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > it was a long time I have read this list or written to it. > > Now, I have a question. This blog post was written about 3 years ago: > https://aphyr.com/posts/282-jepsen-postgres > > Basically, it talks about the client AND the server as a system > and if the network

[GENERAL] PG wire protocol question

Hi, it was a long time I have read this list or written to it. Now, I have a question. This blog post was written about 3 years ago: https://aphyr.com/posts/282-jepsen-postgres Basically, it talks about the client AND the server as a system and if the network is cut between sending COMMIT and