On 3/7/06, Ken Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quick thought, and an possibly over-optimistic forecast:
> I'm am SOOO looking forward to hearing the beta announcement for 8.2...
> hopefully that version's still on target for the standard string escape
> option.. This *one* roadblock wi
Tony Caduto wrote:
Ken Johanson wrote:
Most of the corp folks I know who have tried using PG to augment or
replacement a commercial offering just tend to silently pause and
wait for this change.. that why this topic isn't really heard very
often. It's like going to a car lot to buy a SUV, but
Ken Johanson wrote:
Most of the corp folks I know who have tried using PG to augment or
replacement a commercial offering just tend to silently pause and wait
for this change.. that why this topic isn't really heard very often.
It's like going to a car lot to buy a SUV, but they don't have any
Just a quick thought, and an possibly over-optimistic forecast:
I think PG will see a really significant increase in usage, especially
'corporate' use, with the release of the version that has support for
(what I consider to be) one of the biggest features in recent memory:
standard iso/ansi s
