Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-11-01 Thread Richard Huxton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to all who replied. The reason I wanted to go 64-bit on our Fujitsu sparc-alikes was that our sysadmins switched to 64-bit Perl as part of the standard package, and that broke our DBD::Pg interface. With no warning, we started getting a message about Pg.so,

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-11-01 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 10/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How widespread is the use of PostgreSQL on Solaris? I am beginning to sense that community support is not currently very strong on this platform, and that pgsql may not be the best candidate for my current project -- installing LXR on a

[GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread vodhner
How widespread is the use of PostgreSQL on Solaris? I am beginning to sense that community support is not currently very strong on this platform, and that pgsql may not be the best candidate for my current project -- installing LXR on a 64-bit Solaris system. I had to do a lot of web

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread Ray Stell
I was interested in going down that path. This thread seems to be sparc oriented. How about on opteron? Will pg work on solaris10 without too much stress? isainfo -v 64-bit amd64 applications sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu 32-bit

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Atkins
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How widespread is the use of PostgreSQL on Solaris? I am beginning to sense that community support is not currently very strong on this platform, and that pgsql may not be the best candidate for my current project --

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
Ray Stell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was interested in going down that path. This thread seems to be sparc oriented. How about on opteron? Will pg work on solaris10 without too much stress? It seems like most of the questions in this thread could be answered by perusing the latest version

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:43:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How widespread is the use of PostgreSQL on Solaris? I am beginning Well, one of the core members (Josh Berkus) actually works for Sun, and Sun is officially supporting PostgreSQL in some capacity. Moreover, I ran our Postgres

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread vodhner
Thanks to all who replied. The reason I wanted to go 64-bit on our Fujitsu sparc-alikes was that our sysadmins switched to 64-bit Perl as part of the standard package, and that broke our DBD::Pg interface. With no warning, we started getting a message about Pg.so, Wrong ELF Class:

Re: [GENERAL] Pgsql on Solaris

2006-10-31 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Ray Stell wrote: I was interested in going down that path. This thread seems to be sparc oriented. How about on opteron? Will pg work on solaris10 without too much stress? PostgreSQL will work wonderfully on Solaris10 Opteron. Joshua D Drake isainfo -v 64-bit amd64 applications

[GENERAL] PgSQL 8.1.0 Solaris w/ Sun's cc

2005-12-09 Thread William
Hello, I'm having problems compiling pgsql 8.1.0 for Solaris 10 using Sun Studio 11. I'm giving configure the following arguments: OS: Solaris 10 Hardware: SunFire V100 PATH (the /usr/ucb/cc was renamed to /usr/ucb/cc.old and chmod 000)

Re: [GENERAL] PgSQL 8.1.0 Solaris w/ Sun's cc

2005-12-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
William wrote: configure:2295: checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler configure:2319: cc -c conftest.c 5 conftest.c, line 18: undefined symbol: choke conftest.c, line 18: syntax error before or at: me cc: acomp failed for conftest.c configure:2325: $? = 2 configure: failed

Re: [GENERAL] PgSQL 8.1.0 Solaris w/ Sun's cc

2005-12-09 Thread William
Yep, I'm aware, I've had a 8.0.2 custom built pkgadd package for Solaris 10 with SMF support for awhile now. Just didn't remembre how I got it going. Till I know what version Sun is going with and how they got it setup, I prefer to use my own package. Thanks! -William --- Wes Williams [EMAIL