Paul Thomas wrote:
> > but I was unable to find them in the archive. Also, please reply to me
> > directly, I am not subscribed.
> >
> > Thank you, Ryan Mack
>
> My understanding is that PostgreSQL's BSD-style license leaves you free to
> do whatever want with the it and that includes creating
On 01/11/2003 01:36 Ryan Mack wrote:
First, I want to confirm my understanding that the "without fee" clause
in
the PostgreSQL license means that a party may not sell PostgreSQL or
works
derived from the PostgreSQL source code.
Second, do loadable PostgreSQL modules constitute a derived work? Can
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nope, you are free to do with PostgreSQL (or any derived works) what you
> will ... we are a BSD licensed ... "without fee" means that you can do
> what you like with it *without* having to pay anyone for that right ...
In particular, "without fee"
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Ryan Mack wrote:
> First, I want to confirm my understanding that the "without fee" clause in
> the PostgreSQL license means that a party may not sell PostgreSQL or works
> derived from the PostgreSQL source code.
Nope, you are free to do with PostgreSQL (or any derived wor
First, I want to confirm my understanding that the "without fee" clause in
the PostgreSQL license means that a party may not sell PostgreSQL or works
derived from the PostgreSQL source code.
Second, do loadable PostgreSQL modules constitute a derived work? Can a
party develop new PostgreSQL types
