[GENERAL] Postgres friendly RegEx?

2006-12-12 Thread Jon Asher
Anyone care to correct this regex for PostgreSQL? It works in C++ but Postgres have no love for it: -{0,1}\d*\.{0,1}\d+\^{0,1}\d*\.{0,1}\d+ This regex accepts (any num)^(pos num) such as: 45.2^3 -45.2^3 10^2.5

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres friendly RegEx?

2006-12-12 Thread Tom Lane
Jon Asher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyone care to correct this regex for PostgreSQL? It works in C++ but Postgres have no love for it: -{0,1}\d*\.{0,1}\d+\^{0,1}\d*\.{0,1}\d+ It works fine in Postgres, AFAICT. Maybe you forgot to double the backslashes in a string literal? Otherwise, be

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres friendly RegEx?

2006-12-12 Thread Jon Asher
In Postgres, it appears to be returning false positives: select * from (select '52'::varchar As val) d where d.val ~ '-{0,1}\\d*\\.{0,1}\\d+\\^{0,1}\\d*\\.{0,1}\\d+' returns a record. In C++ only such values match: 45.2^3 or -45.2^3 or 10^2.5 On 12/12/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres friendly RegEx?

2006-12-12 Thread Jon Asher
Please ignore, my mistake in the translation to Pg regex ! On 12/12/06, Jon Asher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Postgres, it appears to be returning false positives: select * from (select '52'::varchar As val) d where d.val ~ '-{0,1}\\d*\\.{0,1}\\d+\\^{0,1}\\d*\\.{0,1}\\d+' returns a record.

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres friendly RegEx?

2006-12-12 Thread Jeremy Harris
You don't give a pg version. It looks legal to me as of 8.1. Try replacing all the {0,1} with ? - but check the manual for regex_flavor too. Is there any chance you're in basic mode? - Jeremy ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to