Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-02 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Greg Smith wrote: On 05/01/2011 01:50 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited number of rows Did you find this via http://www.reversecurity.com/2011/04/new-details-from-psn-hack.html ? That was the only Google-indexed source

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread Greg Smith
On 05/01/2011 01:50 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited number of rows Did you find this via http://www.reversecurity.com/2011/04/new-details-from-psn-hack.html ? That was the only Google-indexed source leading to it I fou

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Tom Lane wrote: Jasen Betts writes: On 2011-05-01, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited number of rows: "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted at different data centers but linked over a

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread Tom Lane
Jasen Betts writes: > On 2011-05-01, Mark Morgan Lloyd > wrote: >> Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a >> limited number of rows: >> >> "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all >> hosted at different data centers but linked over a

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread Jasen Betts
On 2011-05-01, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a > limited number of rows: > > "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all > hosted at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud' Each > database

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 07:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited number of rows: "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted at different data centers but linked over a ty

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread John R Pierce
On 04/30/11 10:50 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited number of rows: "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud' Each database us

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-05-01 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 07:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited > number of rows: > > "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted > at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud' Eac

[GENERAL] Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits

2011-04-30 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a limited number of rows: "INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all hosted at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud' Each database uses PostGRESSQL which would mean the most amount