Fabuous ! Thank you !
On 14 December 2015 at 07:52, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>> Re: I am surprised that you don't expect "0.0.0.0/0" to be returned by the
>> first
>> query if you expect it to be returned by the second.
>> Is that an oversicht?
>>
>> Thanks for the question, but n
Tim Smith wrote:
> Re: I am surprised that you don't expect "0.0.0.0/0" to be returned by the
> first
> query if you expect it to be returned by the second.
> Is that an oversicht?
>
> Thanks for the question, but no, it wasn't an oversight, I only am
> looking for 0.0.0.0/0 to be returned if the
Hi Albe,
Apologies for the delayed reply.
Re: I am surprised that you don't expect "0.0.0.0/0" to be returned by the first
query if you expect it to be returned by the second.
Is that an oversicht?
Thanks for the question, but no, it wasn't an oversight, I only am
looking for 0.0.0.0/0 to be ret
Tim Smith wrote:
> create table test(a inet);
> insert into test values ('0.0.0.0/0');
> insert into test values ('10.1.2.3');
> => select * from test;
> a
> ---
> 0.0.0.0/0
> 10.1.2.3
> (2 rows)
>
>
> This works as expected .
> => select * from test where a <<= '10.1.2.3';
>
Hi,
create table test(a inet);
insert into test values ('0.0.0.0/0');
insert into test values ('10.1.2.3');
=> select * from test;
a
---
0.0.0.0/0
10.1.2.3
(2 rows)
This works as expected .
=> select * from test where a <<= '10.1.2.3';
a
--
10.1.2.3
(1 row)
This