2016-07-08 20:58 GMT+02:00 John R Pierce :
> On 7/8/2016 11:52 AM, Paul Tilles - NOAA Federal wrote:
>
>> I am currently running Version 9.3.10 of postgres with RHEL 6. I am
>> going to upgrade my O/S soon to RHEL 7. Do I need to upgrade to version
>> 9.4.x of postgres?
>>
>
> was 9.3 installed f
On 7/8/2016 11:52 AM, Paul Tilles - NOAA Federal wrote:
I am currently running Version 9.3.10 of postgres with RHEL 6. I am
going to upgrade my O/S soon to RHEL 7. Do I need to upgrade to
version 9.4.x of postgres?
was 9.3 installed from the PGDG yum repository, or from the default RHEL
repo
I am currently running Version 9.3.10 of postgres with RHEL 6. I am going
to upgrade my O/S soon to RHEL 7. Do I need to upgrade to version 9.4.x of
postgres?
Paul Tilles
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It works fine. We already branched RHEL 7 RPMs. I am using them on my
> testing instance.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi Devrim,
Thanks for the quick update !
Regards...
Hi,
It works fine. We already branched RHEL 7 RPMs. I am using them on my testing
instance.
Regards,
On April 1, 2014 5:21:25 PM EEST, Dev Kumkar wrote:
>Hello,
>
>RHEL 7 will be in market by June 2014.
>I just wanted to check here RHEL 7 and Postgres 9.3.4 compatibility?
>
>Regards...
--
Se
Hello,
RHEL 7 will be in market by June 2014.
I just wanted to check here RHEL 7 and Postgres 9.3.4 compatibility?
Regards...
Dave Cramer wrote:
Agreed,
But people who buy RHAS2.1 in my experience are quite adamant about
using RHAS2.1 packages.
Well they are RHAS 2.1 packages :) Just rename them. There is almost
zero difference from a PostgreSQL perspective between 7.3 and AS/ES 2.1.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
You can ge
Agreed,
But people who buy RHAS2.1 in my experience are quite adamant about
using RHAS2.1 packages.
You can get it to build but you have to go in and manually remove some
lines from the spec file.
Dave
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 12:26, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> > rpmbuild is broke
Dave Cramer wrote:
rpmbuild is broken on RH AS2.1, it can't handle nested ifs
The 7.3 packages should work.
Dave
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 21:45, Tom Lane wrote:
Hadley Willan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does anybody know where I can find Redhat Enterprise Linux 2.1
versions of the latest Postgresql
rpmbuild is broken on RH AS2.1, it can't handle nested ifs
Dave
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 21:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hadley Willan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Does anybody know where I can find Redhat Enterprise Linux 2.1
> > versions of the latest Postgresql release?
>
> Your best bet might be
Richard Huxton wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2003 11:16, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:34:27AM +, Richard Huxton wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 November 2003 04:52, Craig O'Shannessy wrote:
> > > > So, what ever happened to the "RedHat database"? I though RH was going
>
Just a question... Are there any reasons not to just take the source and
compile it under RHEL 3.0? Or am I missing something?
(We are about to install 3.0, so I would really like to know..)
BTJ
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The RHEL3 b
Does anyone have any experience with postgres on fedora?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Well, I have never seen any advantages in a package system... :)
As a developer, I like having full control of what I compile
BTJ
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 20:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bjørn T Johansen writes:
>
> > Just a question... Are there any reasons not to just take the source and
>
Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Just a question... Are there any reasons not to just take the source and
compile it under RHEL 3.0? Or am I missing something?
(We are about to install 3.0, so I would really like to know..)
In fact there are some reasons *to* do this :
- compiler optimizations specific
On 13/11/2003 19:32 Rick Gigger wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with postgres on fedora?
Fedora ships with 7.3.4. I've got it running nicely on a laptop.
HTH
--
Paul Thomas
+--+-+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Softw
On Friday 14 November 2003 01:19, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> Well, I have never seen any advantages in a package system... :)
> As a developer, I like having full control of what I compile
>
>
> BTJ
>
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 20:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bjørn T Johansen writes:
> > > Just
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 11:57 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Haberlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> > tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES
> Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about thi
Adam Haberlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES
Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this.
(Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired
Well, we've got 50 or so customer boxes that we need to upgrade, so we
need the package management. I used to build my own from source, too,
and still do on my Solaris box, but I like being able to add and remove
things reliable. But to each their own.
apt and fedora.
'
--
Command P
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> On that note, does anyone have suggestions for which version of the
> server I should run? I see that there are seperate binary RPMS for
> different Linux versions, but nothing for version 3 -- should I spend some
> time doing a full install, bui
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:03:44PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Adam Haberlach wrote:
>
> > On that note, does anyone have suggestions for which version of the
> > server I should run? I see that there are seperate binary RPMS for
> > different Linux versions, but nothing
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:56:29AM -0600, Darryl W. DeLao Jr wrote:
> Im currently on red hat 7.3 running postgres. Everything is running fine.
> Obviously, Im going to have to upgrade to RHEL 3 in order to receive
> updates, etc. Does anyone know of any problems with postgres running on
> RHEL 2
23 matches
Mail list logo
