-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:53:45 -0500
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 December 2007 17:29, Erik Jones wrote:
> > > i dont think you'll have much luck taking the "spread data evenly
> > > throught the
> > > partitions" approach;
On Dec 7, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 17:29, Erik Jones wrote:
i dont think you'll have much luck taking the "spread data evenly
throught the
partitions" approach; figure out how best to segment your data into
manageable chunks. HTH.
I agree. That's
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 17:29, Erik Jones wrote:
> > i dont think you'll have much luck taking the "spread data evenly
> > throught the
> > partitions" approach; figure out how best to segment your data into
> > manageable chunks. HTH.
>
> I agree. That's also why I'm not too worried about
Rober,
Thank you once again for your input.
On Dec 5, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Robert Treat wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007 17:32, Erik Jones wrote:
Too much to keep quoted here. Check the archives if you want
to read more about the setup for this conversation.
-[ RECORD 1 ]+
On Monday 03 December 2007 17:32, Erik Jones wrote:
> Hi, I've inherited a database schema wherein the original
> developers took the inheritance mechanism to an extreme where new
> client accounts get 13 different tables of their own created for
> them. We're at the many tens of thousands of tab
Hi, I've inherited a database schema wherein the original
developers took the inheritance mechanism to an extreme where new
client accounts get 13 different tables of their own created for
them. We're at the many tens of thousands of tables mark (well over
100K) and I'm going to be re-par
