Re: [GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX

2016-02-03 Thread FarjadFarid(ChkNet)
al-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh berkus Sent: 03 February 2016 03:53 To: Bill Ross; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX On 02/02/2016 07:32 PM, Bill Ross wrote: > I have a program that inserts 50M re

Re: [GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX

2016-02-03 Thread FarjadFarid(ChkNet)
l.org [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh berkus Sent: 03 February 2016 03:53 To: Bill Ross; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX On 02/02/2016 07:32 PM, Bill Ross wrote: > I have a program that inserts 50M records of

Re: [GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX

2016-02-03 Thread Chris Mair
I have a program that inserts 50M records of about 30 bytes each [..] Now I suspect the limit is OSX throttling per-process CPU. Does this sound right? Mmm... I don't think so. How do you perform the inserts? - Single inserts per transaction? - Bundled inserts in transactions (with or with

Re: [GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX

2016-02-02 Thread Josh berkus
On 02/02/2016 07:32 PM, Bill Ross wrote: I have a program that inserts 50M records of about 30 bytes each, with some simple indexing, using about 5 GB of disk, layout shown below. When I run the program without the inserts, it takes a few seconds to do just the calculation part. With inserts, it

[GENERAL] SSD gives disappointing speed up on OSX

2016-02-02 Thread Bill Ross
I have a program that inserts 50M records of about 30 bytes each, with some simple indexing, using about 5 GB of disk, layout shown below. When I run the program without the inserts, it takes a few seconds to do just the calculation part. With inserts, it takes about 90 minutes to run on my ma