Re: [GENERAL] Slave claims requested WAL segment already removed - but it wasn't

Thanks! This seems to be exactly what the issue was. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 03:36 AM, Nick Cleaton wrote: > On 2 June 2016 at 02:43, Jeff Beck wrote: > > Hi- > > We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on > > Centos 7). During a period of heavy use,

Re: [GENERAL] Slave claims requested WAL segment already removed - but it wasn't

On 2 June 2016 at 02:43, Jeff Beck wrote: > Hi- > We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on > Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining > that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But > the WAL

Re: [GENERAL] Slave claims requested WAL segment already removed - but it wasn't

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Beck wrote: > Hi- > We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on > Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining > that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But > the

Re: [GENERAL] Slave claims requested WAL segment already removed - but it wasn't

On 06/01/2016 06:43 PM, Jeff Beck wrote: Hi- We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But the WAL segment was still on the master.

[GENERAL] Slave claims requested WAL segment already removed - but it wasn't

Hi- We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But the WAL segment was still on the master. The issue was resolved by manually copying