Re: [GENERAL] Trim performance on 9.5

2016-11-20 Thread Vincent Elschot
Op 18/11/2016 om 16:58 schreef William Ivanski: I just ran EXPLAIN ANALYZE, please see images attached. Field doesn't have a index. Em sex, 18 de nov de 2016 às 12:16, vinny > escreveu: On 2016-11-18 15:06, William Ivanski wrote: > Hi,

Re: [GENERAL] Trim performance on 9.5

2016-11-18 Thread William Ivanski
I just ran EXPLAIN ANALYZE, please see images attached. Field doesn't have a index. Em sex, 18 de nov de 2016 às 12:16, vinny escreveu: > On 2016-11-18 15:06, William Ivanski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently did major improvements on perfomance on our routines by > > simply

Re: [GENERAL] Trim performance on 9.5

2016-11-18 Thread vinny
On 2016-11-18 15:06, William Ivanski wrote: Hi, I recently did major improvements on perfomance on our routines by simply removing the call for trim functions on specific bottlenecks. Please see images attached for a simple example. I'm using PostgreSQL version 9.5.5-1.pgdg80+1 on Debian 8.6.

[GENERAL] Trim performance on 9.5

2016-11-18 Thread William Ivanski
Hi, I recently did major improvements on perfomance on our routines by simply removing the call for trim functions on specific bottlenecks. Please see images attached for a simple example. I'm using PostgreSQL version 9.5.5-1.pgdg80+1 on Debian 8.6. Someone knows if it's a bug on trim function?