We use noatime on our production database without issues.
On 8/28/07, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to "Keaton Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
> > has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volum
In response to "Keaton Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
> has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
> noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
> achieve. Does PostgreSQL use
Keaton Adams wrote:
> After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
> has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
> noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
> achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime in any way when reading/wr
"Keaton Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
> has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
> noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
> achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime in
After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime in any way when reading/writing
data? If we turn off/
