Hi
Has anyone looked at the user gallery recently? Its a bit of a mess.
You need to clean up some of the entries, such as the one where all fields
were filled in with testing_shit
Also, you need to make sure that if the URL entry doesnt start off with a
protocol, you add http:// to the start, c
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> At 21:07 +0300 on 17/6/98, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
>
> > If you wish to suggest a good layout that will allow for the same amount
> > of information in less columns, I'm all ears...I couldn't figure out one
> > :)
>
> Here's a suggestion:
>
> Put
At 21:07 +0300 on 17/6/98, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> If you wish to suggest a good layout that will allow for the same amount
> of information in less columns, I'm all ears...I couldn't figure out one
> :)
Here's a suggestion:
Put the "date added" as a separate line, and make the table contai
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
>
> > Make the first column with the current table headers. In the second column
> > the content.
>
> You lost me on that one...the way I'm reading it, you are suggesting going
> further across the screen? Or do you mean do one site per table, each
>
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
> Scrolling horizontally isn't as good as scrolling vertical. I would
> suggest to have one entry over the next so I can see all information all
> together on the scren. And of course leave out rows with no content.
I, personally, do not like the i
Scrolling horizontally isn't as good as scrolling vertical. I would
suggest to have one entry over the next so I can see all information all
together on the scren. And of course leave out rows with no content.
-Egon
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmi
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
> Make the first column with the current table headers. In the second column
> the content.
You lost me on that one...the way I'm reading it, you are suggesting going
further across the screen? Or do you mean do one site per table, each
table vertical fro
Make the first column with the current table headers. In the second column
the content.
-Egon
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
>
> > Hi, is it possible to reduce the number of columns to two or three. It
> > doesn't fit very well in netsca
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
> Hi, is it possible to reduce the number of columns to two or three. It
> doesn't fit very well in netscape
If you wish to suggest a good layout that will allow for the same amount
of information in less columns, I'm all ears...I couldn't figure out one
:
Hi, is it possible to reduce the number of columns to two or three. It
doesn't fit very well in netscape
-Egon
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Just added some more entries to the User Gallery located at
> http://www.postgresql.org/user_gallery...
>
> We're up to a grand tota
Just added some more entries to the User Gallery located at
http://www.postgresql.org/user_gallery...
We're up to a grand total of 18 sites that are using PostgreSQL...and I
thought we had so many more then that :)
11 matches
Mail list logo
