Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum message

2004-11-11 Thread Kevin Barnard
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:56:48 -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Were they both VACUUM ANALYZEs? There's a known gotcha that if you > ANALYZE the same table concurrently in two different sessions, one > of them can fail this way when it goes to update the pg_statistic > entries. (Harm

Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum message

2004-11-11 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know I've seen this message before but I'm not quite sure what it > means. I think it's because I have two vacuums running over each > other. Does this sound right? It's comming from 7.4.x server. > ERROR: tuple concurrently updated Were they both

[GENERAL] Vacuum message

2004-11-11 Thread Kevin Barnard
I know I've seen this message before but I'm not quite sure what it means. I think it's because I have two vacuums running over each other. Does this sound right? It's comming from 7.4.x server. ERROR: tuple concurrently updated ---(end of broadcast)---