[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Sorry, I was wrong. It's a charachter(12) not a varchar and it's a
> domain.
> The isins in z_ul either start with 'DE000' or with 'CH003'. PG seems
> to compare only the first few charachters because when I set the
> reference to CASCADE all z_ul entries that start with
Sorry, I was wrong. It's a charachter(12) not a varchar and it's a
domain.
The isins in z_ul either start with 'DE000' or with 'CH003'. PG seems
to compare only the first few charachters because when I set the
reference to CASCADE all z_ul entries that start with 'DE000' are
deleted. I tested it in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It's Version 8.3.
> Both columns are of a user defined datatype which is a varchar(12)
> with a special check.
You mean a DOMAIN, or you mean a special datatype with custom C code?
If the latter, I'd suspect the C code. 8.3 has more stringent coding
rules for variable-
It's Version 8.3.
Both columns are of a user defined datatype which is a varchar(12)
with a special check.
I already did a REINDEX but it didn't help.
On 6 Mrz., 18:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
> What PG version is this? Are the two columns of identical datatypes?
> (I'm wondering abo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So there is no record in z_ul that references z_base with isin
> 'DE000DB3BTR9', but when I do:
> delete from z_base where isin = 'DE000DB3BTR9';
> ERROR: update or delete on table "z_base" violates foreign key
> constraint "z_ul_isin_fkey" on table "z_ul"
> DETAIL: K
Hi,
I encountered an odd behaviour when I tried to delete a record.
I have two tables "z_base" and "z_ul". z_base's primary key is "isin"
which is referenced by z_ul.
select count(*) from z_base where isin = 'DE000DB3BTR9';
count
---
1
select count(*) from z_ul where isin = 'DE000DB3BT