On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> I'm not trying to be obtuse, but I am not understanding how you
> connect this issue, which has to do with the way PostgreSQL's RULE
> system works, with writeable CTEs, which have approximately nothing in
> common with the issue except in tha
On 2010-06-01 16:07 +0300, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 08:21:46PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>>
I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that
will make rule based update-able views based multip
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 08:21:46PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>
> >> I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that
> >> will make rule based update-able views based multiple vertically
> >> partitioned table robust. By r
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Richard Broersma
wrote:
> The following email was my first discovery that these kinds of
> update-able view were not get-along well with client side optimistic
> locking.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2006-12/msg00029.php
Actually this link better
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 6:25 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that will
>> make rule based update-able views based multiple vertically
>> partitioned table robust. By robust, I mean to elimination the
>> update anomalies that can occur from the
David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:38:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:50PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > > > This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs
> > > > are not in core, but...
> > > >
> > >
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:38:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:50PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > > This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs
> > > are not in core, but...
> > >
> > > I wondering if write-able CTE's
David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:50PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
> > This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs are not
> > in core, but...
> >
> > I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that will
> > make rule based update-able views b
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:50PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote:
> This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs are not
> in core, but...
>
> I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that will
> make rule based update-able views based multiple vertically
> parti
This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs are not
in core, but...
I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that will
make rule based update-able views based multiple vertically
partitioned table robust. By robust, I mean to elimination the update
anomalies th
10 matches
Mail list logo
