Re: [GENERAL] cobol storedprocedures

2005-08-17 Thread Christopher Browne
> I've been scanning the postgres website and yours to find out any > information on cobol stored procedures. Is there any plans on > incorporating this in future releases? Not really. The 'preferred' sorts of languages to include for stored procedures tend to be interpreted languages. There is

Re: [GENERAL] cobol storedprocedures

2005-08-17 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:05:07PM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote: > On 8/15/05, MICHAEL BATTANI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been scanning the postgres website and yours to find out any > > information on cobol stored procedures. Is there any plans on incorporating > > this > > in future rele

Re: [GENERAL] cobol storedprocedures

2005-08-17 Thread Dawid Kuroczko
On 8/15/05, MICHAEL BATTANI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been scanning the postgres website and yours to find out any > information on cobol stored procedures. Is there any plans on incorporating > this > in future releases? I don't think anyone is working on such a thing right now. The pro

[GENERAL] cobol storedprocedures

2005-08-17 Thread MICHAEL BATTANI
I've been scanning the postgres website and yours to find out any information on cobol stored procedures. Is there any plans on incorporating this in future releases? Michael Battani Companion Technologies 8901 Farrow Road Columbia, SC 29203 803.264.3569 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---