Dawid Kuroczko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And now, some time ago, PostgreSQL mailing lists were gatewayed
> into Big8 namespace, to help people access them by other means.
> Only it was done "unoffically", i.e. not following standard procedure
> for such things. It could be thought of as "hoo
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Joel wrote:
Mike Cox sent an email to the newsgroup news.groups last night saying he's
giving up the usenet effort because of resistance here. What a shame.
Marc,
Should we leave this as is, or would you like someone to pick the RFD
back up?
I'm not in the resistance group, but
> Mike Cox sent an email to the newsgroup news.groups last night saying he's
> giving up the usenet effort because of resistance here. What a shame.
Marc,
Should we leave this as is, or would you like someone to pick the RFD
back up?
(Yes, I'm saying I can volunteer. My pace would be a bit slow,
>
> > Honestly, people here generally don't give a hoot what the other 'big'
> > databases do (which is
>
> I tend to look at it from complete different angle. Let's leave the
> group stuff for a while and think about SQL. PostgreSQL seeks
> to conform SQL standards as much as it is reasonable.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Rawnsley
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 12:26 PM
> To: Pgsql General
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] comp.database.postgresql.*
>
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2004, at 1:56
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:26:21 -0500, Andrew Rawnsley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I think that's about as silly a statement as I've read on
> this list. I have never seen
> any Oracle, DB2, or Sybase materials that claim 'We're big time - we
> have a legit comp. newsgroup' (that woul
On Nov 11, 2004, at 1:56 PM, Max wrote:
I am starting to believe that the issue behind all this fuss is an
identity
problem: does postgresql want to play side-by-side with the big
database
players and have an official, legal and legitimate newsgroup, or does
it
want to stay in the closet ?
Max
Hi all,
Mike Cox sent an email to the newsgroup news.groups last night saying he's
giving up the usenet effort because of resistance here. What a shame.
I can't handle all the emails of this list on my mailbox, and quite frankly
I am interested in reading 10% of the emails only. Someone said earl
