Re: [GENERAL] comp.databases.postgresql.* groups and RFD

2004-11-27 Thread Woodchuck Bill
Marc G. Fournier From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Robert McClenon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>Another thread on the topic of this RFD was cross-posted to >>pgsql.general. I didn't notice that it was cross-posted, and so >>cross-posted a reply to news.groups and p

Re: [GENERAL] comp.databases.postgresql.* groups and RFD

2004-11-27 Thread Woodchuck Bill
Gary L. Burnore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: >>I just realized what a bad name pgsql.* is for a hierarchy. If someone >>wants to look for a newgroup for PostgreSQL, he will type that >>word/string into his newsreader and it will not bring up any of these >>newsgroups. >

Re: [GENERAL] comp.databases.postgresql.* groups and RFD

2004-11-27 Thread Woodchuck Bill
Woodchuck Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > "Adam H. Kerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > news:pIOdndYMRqGJ7DrcRVn- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> Are these meant to be worldwide Usenet groups >> or newsgroups local to your server? > > Supernews is already carrying all 29 o