2014-12-04 17:31 GMT-06:00 Adrian Klaver :
> On 12/04/2014 03:11 PM, Carlos Carcamo wrote:
>>
>> 2014-12-04 16:46 GMT-06:00 David G Johnston :
>>>
>>> Carlos Carcamo wrote
I read about oGlenrder of execution of triggers, is supposed that postgres
executes triggers in alphabetical ord
On 12/04/2014 03:11 PM, Carlos Carcamo wrote:
2014-12-04 16:46 GMT-06:00 David G Johnston :
Carlos Carcamo wrote
I read about order of execution of triggers, is supposed that postgres
executes triggers in alphabetical order, so I called the plpgsql
a_trigger and the second one b_trigger (as an
On 12/4/2014 6:11 PM, Carlos Carcamo wrote:
Yes because my update_remote.sh file calls a php file to update a
table in mysql, and it is updated after I perform another query to
in_kardex, so the mysql table is one query behind postgres... Any
thoughts?
My bet is that the query run from your
2014-12-04 16:46 GMT-06:00 David G Johnston :
> Carlos Carcamo wrote
>> I read about order of execution of triggers, is supposed that postgres
>> executes triggers in alphabetical order, so I called the plpgsql
>> a_trigger and the second one b_trigger (as an example), but it seems
>> that the seco
Carlos Carcamo wrote
> I read about order of execution of triggers, is supposed that postgres
> executes triggers in alphabetical order, so I called the plpgsql
> a_trigger and the second one b_trigger (as an example), but it seems
> that the second one always executes first.
>
> Is there any way
Hello list, hope you're well.
I need some help with postgres.
I have two triggers that are executed after insert, update and delete.
One trigger is with plpgsql language and the other one is with
pl/python, the first one just update some tables and last one calls a
*.sh that is executed to perfor
