Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
On 24/10/2009 20:46, Tawita Tererei wrote:
In addition to this what about MySQL, how much data (records) that can be
managed with it?
regards
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:32 AM, shahrzad khorrami <
shahrzad.khorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
is postgres a good solution for bill
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:32 AM, shahrzad khorrami
> wrote:
>> is postgres a good solution for billion record data, think of 300kb data
>> insert into db at each minutes, I'm coding with php
>> what do you recommend to manage these data?
>
>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:32 AM, shahrzad khorrami
wrote:
> is postgres a good solution for billion record data, think of 300kb data
> insert into db at each minutes, I'm coding with php
> what do you recommend to manage these data?
You'll want a server with LOTS of hard drives spinning under it.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Tawita Tererei wrote:
> In addition to this what about MySQL, how much data (records) that can be
> managed with it?
That's a question for the mysql mailing lists / forums really. I do
know there's some artificial limit in the low billions that you have
to create
On 24/10/2009 20:46, Tawita Tererei wrote:
> In addition to this what about MySQL, how much data (records) that can be
> managed with it?
>
> regards
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:32 AM, shahrzad khorrami <
> shahrzad.khorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> is postgres a good solution for billion record
In addition to this what about MySQL, how much data (records) that can be
managed with it?
regards
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:32 AM, shahrzad khorrami <
shahrzad.khorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> is postgres a good solution for billion record data, think of 300kb data
> insert into db at each minutes,
is postgres a good solution for billion record data, think of 300kb data
insert into db at each minutes, I'm coding with php
what do you recommend to manage these data?
--
Shahrzad Khorrami