Re: [GENERAL] pg-dump problem

1998-08-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
> At 17:51 +0300 on 19/8/98, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > I believe this was fixed in the coming 6.4 beta, September 1. > > Ah, I see... now, where did I put that time machine... :) > > Well, I thought I'd do a pg_dump -S and append the normal pg_dump to it. > Thus, the schema will be created

Re: [GENERAL] pg-dump problem

1998-08-19 Thread Herouth Maoz
At 17:51 +0300 on 19/8/98, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I believe this was fixed in the coming 6.4 beta, September 1. Ah, I see... now, where did I put that time machine... :) Well, I thought I'd do a pg_dump -S and append the normal pg_dump to it. Thus, the schema will be created twice, and whateve

Re: [GENERAL] pg-dump problem

1998-08-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Preface: > === > > Well, finally, we have decided to start backing up the Postgres databases > we have. And the decision even came before anything got destroyed... > > So, our sysadmin basically made a modified version of the dumpall script, > that creates individual files for each databas

[GENERAL] pg-dump problem

1998-08-19 Thread Herouth Maoz
Preface: === Well, finally, we have decided to start backing up the Postgres databases we have. And the decision even came before anything got destroyed... So, our sysadmin basically made a modified version of the dumpall script, that creates individual files for each database, which include