Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall behavior in 9.1beta1

2011-05-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
oops! sorry for the noise it was an innocuous 'NOTICE' not ERROR as claimed. thanks for your time. regds mallah. On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Rajesh Kumar Mallah writes: >> We migrated to 9.1beta1 from 9.0.x in our development environment. >> we shall report if any sign

Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall behavior in 9.1beta1

2011-05-13 Thread Tom Lane
Rajesh Kumar Mallah writes: > We migrated to 9.1beta1 from 9.0.x in our development environment. > we shall report if any significant problems or issue arises out of this. > one small thing that we observed rite now regarding pg_dumpall output is that > the ALTER USER is referring to some db obj

[GENERAL] pg_dumpall behavior in 9.1beta1

2011-05-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Dear List , We migrated to 9.1beta1 from 9.0.x in our development environment. we shall report if any significant problems or issue arises out of this. one small thing that we observed rite now regarding pg_dumpall output is that the ALTER USER is referring to some db objects which are not creat