-- Original message --
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Klaver) writes:
> > From: "Alain Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> once to do a comparison they use :
> > IF (ret == 1) THEN ...
> >> once,
> > IF (ret = 1) THEN...
>
> > Both are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Klaver) writes:
> From: "Alain Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> once to do a comparison they use :
> IF (ret == 1) THEN ...
>> once,
> IF (ret = 1) THEN...
> Both are correct.
No they're not, as a simple test would convince you ...
there is no '==' operator in SQL.
this is what i did, and it's true that '==' does not exist under pl/pgsql.
Only '=' should be used.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Klaver) writes:
> > From: "Alain Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> once to do a comparison they use :
-- Original message --
From: "Alain Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> i've read several books extract about controlling loops in postgreSQL under
> pl/pgsql and there is something interesting.
>
> once to do a comparison they use :
>
> > IF (ret == 1) THEN ..
Hi,
i've read several books extract about controlling loops in postgreSQL under
pl/pgsql and there is something interesting.
once to do a comparison they use :
> IF (ret == 1) THEN ...
once,
> IF (ret = 1) THEN...
so are they both correct ?
comming from .NET/C++ world, usually we use '==' o
