Randall Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm at a loss as to how to remove the OF clause at the server. It it
> possible to do it with a rule?
No, because the syntax error will occur long before any rule has a
chance to get involved. You'd have to actually hack the C code
(see transformLocki
Erik Jones wrote:
This may be a dupe. I sent and had some issues with my mail client and
afterwards it was sitting all alone in my outbox, if you've already seen
this, sorry for the resend...
On Mar 14, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Randall Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to process a query written in
Erik Jones wrote:
This may be a dupe. I sent and had some issues with my mail client and
afterwards it was sitting all alone in my outbox, if you've already seen
this, sorry for the resend...
On Mar 14, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Randall Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to process a query written in
This may be a dupe. I sent and had some issues with my mail client
and afterwards it was sitting all alone in my outbox, if you've
already seen this, sorry for the resend...
On Mar 14, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Randall Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to process a query written in the form:
S
Hi,
I'm attempting to process a query written in the form:
SELECT fields FROM table WHERE conditions FOR UPDATE OF field_name
when Postgresql supports:
SELECT fields FROM table WHERE conditions FOR UPDATE OF table_name
I'd like to remove the OF clause in the case only one table is que
