Re: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks

2004-01-07 Thread Rodrigo Malara
Best Wishes, > > Chris Travers > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Ochs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:52 AM > > Subject: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks > >

Re: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks

2004-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 16:52:12 -0800, Chris Ochs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to do a series of inserts within a single transaction block, but with > postgresql if one insert fails, the whole block is aborted. Is there any > way to get around this behavior so that postgresql won't abort

Re: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks

2004-01-07 Thread scott.marlowe
Message - > From: "Chris Ochs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:52 AM > Subject: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks > > > > I want to do a series of inserts within a single transaction block

Re: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks

2004-01-07 Thread Chris Travers
IL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:52 AM Subject: [GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks > I want to do a series of inserts within a single transaction block, but with > postgresql if one insert fails, the whole block is aborted. Is there any > way to get around this be

[GENERAL] problems with transaction blocks

2004-01-06 Thread Chris Ochs
I want to do a series of inserts within a single transaction block, but with postgresql if one insert fails, the whole block is aborted. Is there any way to get around this behavior so that postgresql won't abort the entire transaction if a single insert returns an error? Chris