Tom, Alvaro:
Thank you much for the clarification. It's "back to the drawing board" for
me!
Kynn
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm leaning towards the re-design option, primarily because I really
> don't
> >
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm leaning towards the re-design option, primarily because I
really don't
really understand the consequences of cranking up
max_locks_per_transaction.
E.g. Why is its default value 2^6, instead of, say, 2
"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm leaning towards the re-design option, primarily because I really don't
> really understand the consequences of cranking up max_locks_per_transaction.
> E.g. Why is its default value 2^6, instead of, say, 2^15? In fact, why is
> there a ceiling on the
Kynn Jones escribió:
> I'm leaning towards the re-design option, primarily because I really don't
> really understand the consequences of cranking up max_locks_per_transaction.
> E.g. Why is its default value 2^6, instead of, say, 2^15?
It's because it (partly) defines how much shared memory the
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Initially I didn't know what our max_locks_per_transaction was (nor even
> a
> > typical value for it), but in light of the procedure's failure after
> 3500
> > iterations, I figured
"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Initially I didn't know what our max_locks_per_transaction was (nor even a
> typical value for it), but in light of the procedure's failure after 3500
> iterations, I figured that it was 3500 or so. In fact ours is only 64 (the
> default), so I'm now thor
I've written a PL/pgSQL function that is supposed to create a whole bunch
(~4000) tables:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION create_tables () RETURNS void
AS $$
DECLARE
_s RECORD;
_t TEXT;
BEGIN
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS base CASCADE;
CREATE TABLE base ( /* omit lengthy definition */ );
FOR _s IN SEL
