Faheem Mitha wrote:
> Regardless, you don't address why the email I sent disappeared into
> the ether. If it was rejected due to excessive length, then it would
> be polite to get an automated rejection. Perhaps something like
>
> "Your message is too long and so is being rejected. Messages to th
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Faheem Mitha wrote:
I submitted a modified self-contained email as requested, but it does not
appear to have made it to the list, and I never got any kind of reject
message. It was around 1000 lines with no attachments. Is there a size
limit for pos
Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Faheem Mitha writes:
> >> ... In any case, feedback would be helpful. Details of my attempts
> >> at optimization are at
> >> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf
> >
> > By and large, this is not the way to ask
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Faheem Mitha writes:
... In any case, feedback would be helpful. Details of my attempts
at optimization are at
http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf
By and large, this is not the way to ask for help on the Postgres lists.
If you're supplyin
Hi again Andy,
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:59:24 -0500, Andy Colson wrote:
> On 03/28/2010 07:43 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
>> On 03/28/2010 03:05 PM, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Wait... Your saying your question is so complex it needs 41 pages
>> (including graphs) to ask? I didn't bother before, b
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Andy Colson wrote:
Wait... Your saying your question is so complex it needs 41 pages
(including graphs) to ask? I didn't bother before, but now I'm curious,
I'll have to go take a look.
No, only the 25 page document (which has the graphs) is directly related
to the qu
On 03/28/2010 07:43 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 03/28/2010 03:05 PM, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Wait... Your saying your question is so complex it needs 41 pages
(including graphs) to ask? I didn't bother before, but now I'm curious,
I'll have to go take a look.
-Andy
Faheem, you seem to be incred
On 03/28/2010 03:05 PM, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Faheem Mitha writes:
... In any case, feedback would be helpful. Details of my attempts
at optimization are at
http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf
By and large, this is not the way to ask for h
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Faheem Mitha writes:
... In any case, feedback would be helpful. Details of my attempts
at optimization are at
http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf
By and large, this is not the way to ask for help on the Postgres lists.
If you're supplyin
Faheem Mitha writes:
> ... In any case, feedback would be helpful. Details of my attempts
> at optimization are at
> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf
By and large, this is not the way to ask for help on the Postgres lists.
If you're supplying extremely large test data or someth
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to reduce both memory usage and runtime for a query. An
issue I have encountered is that I can drastically reduce both runtime and
memory usage by splitting up the query into two pieces and gluing them
together outside PostgreSQL. However, I'm unable to get simil
11 matches
Mail list logo
