Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:08 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 > wrote: >> >> I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum >> regarding command line vs

Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread David G. Johnston
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 wrote: > I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum > regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. ​I suspect that most people administering a PostgreSQL database would expect that the

Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Lane
rakeshkumar464 writes: > I am new to Docker env and I see that PG, as a container is started with > [ lots of command-line parameters ] > I would prefer using postgresql.conf. what is the consensus in this forum > regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. Also if

[GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con

2017-10-30 Thread rakeshkumar464
I am new to Docker env and I see that PG, as a container is started with parameters like this: docker run -it \ --detach \ --name name \ --restart=unless-stopped \ -p 5432:5432 \ -e PGDATA=/var/lib/postgresql/data/pg10 -N 500 \ -B 3GB \ -S 6291kB \ -c listen_addresses=* \ -c