On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:23:15PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
> is this true even if one of the server just send SELECTs?
Yep.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.po
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Jaime Casanova
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok... actually i see no real value in that config (create a single
> point of contention) but everyone that has used (or at least read
> about) oracle think is the best thing to do...
Having dealth with RAC, I can safely s
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 16:23 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
> >> postgresql be running
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Jaime Casanova
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
>>> postgres
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
>> postgresql be running on both at the same time.
>
> More importantly, if you do this, y
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:43:24AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You may have two servers pointed at $PGDATA but at no point can
> postgresql be running on both at the same time.
More importantly, if you do this, you will probably be able to get the
two postmasters to start up. This will perma
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 12:29 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a client of mine is obsessed with the idea of having two postgres
> servers looking at the same partition of data... i think i can
> configure two servers pointing to the same $PGDATADIR and let one off
> and the other on but is it
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Jaime Casanova
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a client of mine is obsessed with the idea of having two postgres
> servers looking at the same partition of data... i think i can
> configure two servers pointing to the same $PGDATADIR and let one off
> and the ot
Hi,
a client of mine is obsessed with the idea of having two postgres
servers looking at the same partition of data... i think i can
configure two servers pointing to the same $PGDATADIR and let one off
and the other on but is it possible for load balancing, i mean with
the two servers active? obv
11 matches
Mail list logo
