On 11/17/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Small implementation detail: Also keep a count of how many times the
same
> session requested the same lock, and do not release the lock until he
> requests same number of releases.
No need for that,
"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11/17/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> we need a special case when we are already a member of the MultiXact:
>> fall through without trying to reacquire the tuple lock.
> Small implementation detail: Also keep a count of how many times the
On 11/17/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we need a special case when we are already a member of the MultiXact:
fall through without trying to reacquire the tuple lock.
Small implementation detail: Also keep a count of how many times the same
session requested the same lock, and do not
