"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> BTW, have you looked into the theory that it's triggered by total
>> data volume rather than number of columns? That is, try selecting
>> all the columns but use LIMIT to reduce the number of rows fetched?
> The where clause limits the number of r
> "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 10/11/07, Carlos H. Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It=B4s "" but the "query_start" column is refreshed.
>
> > Then the query runs and finishes and the problem is something to do
> > with the delivery of the data. Not sure after that...
>
> On 10/11/07, Carlos H. Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > SELECT * or naming all the columns locks the client
> > > application. Yesterday
> > > > I´ve wrongly said that when naming all the columns instead of
> > > using the *
> > > > th
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SELECT * or naming all the columns locks the client
> application. Yesterday
> > I´ve wrongly said that when naming all the columns instead of
> using the *
> > the applications did not lock.
>
> Hm, are you sure it's not one specific column that
