Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-08-04 Thread Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)
: Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) Cc: Alvaro Herrera; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Rao, Srikanth R (STSD); Racharla, Chakravarthy (STSD); Manchenahalli, Raghunandan (STSD); Hebbar, Raghavendra (STSD) Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function. "Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)" <[EM

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-08-04 Thread Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)
); Hebbar, Raghavendra (STSD) Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function. Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > > Thanks Alvaro,for your deliberate explanation.But few more > clarifications are requested as we are too novice to postgreSQL. Let me give you this piece

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-08-04 Thread Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)
, Chakravarthy (STSD); Manchenahalli, Raghunandan (STSD); Hebbar, Raghavendra (STSD) Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function. Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > Hello Alvaro, > > Thanks Alvaro for your time and suggestions.Yes we do understand that > we are exp

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks Alvaro for your time and suggestions.Yes we do understand that we > are expected to use the higher versions.But as Bruce pointed out > already,the same is NOT recommended when there is NO imperative > reason. Say again? Bruce's po

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-31 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > Hello Alvaro, > > Thanks Alvaro for your time and suggestions.Yes we do understand that we > are expected to use the higher versions.But as Bruce pointed out > already,the same is NOT recommended when there is NO imperative > reason.Hence we were just in the p

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-31 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > > > > Thanks Alvaro,for your deliberate explanation.But few more > > clarifications are requested as we are too novice to postgreSQL. > > Let me give you this piece of advice, since you are too novice to > PostgreSQL: > > Do NOT conti

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-31 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > > Thanks Alvaro,for your deliberate explanation.But few more > clarifications are requested as we are too novice to postgreSQL. Let me give you this piece of advice, since you are too novice to PostgreSQL: Do NOT continue to run 7.4.2. Upgrade to 7.4.17. N

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-31 Thread Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)
(STSD); Hebbar, Raghavendra (STSD) Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function. Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > > Hello Alvaro, > > Thanks for your reply. > > We could see > "Fix potential-data-corruption bug in how VACUUM FULL handles UPDATE &

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-31 Thread Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)
ERAL] Core reported from vaccum function. Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > Hello All, > > We are getting the following core more oftenly.But We don't have a > test case where it is guaranteed to dump this core.We are using 7.4.2 > version postgres and if any one of

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-07-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > > Hello Alvaro, > > Thanks for your reply. > > We could see > "Fix potential-data-corruption bug in how VACUUM FULL handles UPDATE > chains (Tom, Pavan Deolasee) " in 7.4.17 release notes. > > Could you please elaborate more on the above problem.Meaning wh

Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

2007-06-18 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote: > Hello All, > > We are getting the following core more oftenly.But We don't have a test > case where it is guaranteed to dump this core.We are using 7.4.2 version > postgres and if any one of you aware about some bug fixes happened > around this problem.Please l