On Monday, March 15, 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>
> Windows XP Embedded is not a tested or supported platform for
> PostgreSQL. I have no idea if it will work or not.
>
> To make changes to your
> subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
>
> As it turns out I have succe
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I could swear I've seen cases where xp embedded failed because it was
missing a bunch of security api's. Is it like ce where such things can
be removed by an oem manufacturer?
yeah, eggzackly.every component imaginable is custom configurable.
there's some things i
Windows XP Embedded is not a tested or supported platform for
PostgreSQL. I have no idea if it will work or not.
To make changes to your
subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
As it turns out I have succeeded, So pg seems to work OK on Windows
Embedded
indeed, X
On Mar 15, 7:23 pm, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Jeffrey Ottery
>
> wrote:
> > Anyone have some idea how to do this? I am able to install my Win32
> > application but the postgeSQL install will not work. Any help or at
> > least a starting point would be
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Jeffrey Ottery
wrote:
> Anyone have some idea how to do this? I am able to install my Win32
> application but the postgeSQL install will not work. Any help or at
> least a starting point would be appreciated.
Windows XP Embedded is not a tested or supported platfo
Jim Nasby wrote:
> BTW, 8.2.2 has a rather nasty bug; you'll want to go grab 8.2.3 or
> 8.2.1.
You don't want 8.2.1 either because it has a nasty security bug.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development,
BTW, 8.2.2 has a rather nasty bug; you'll want to go grab 8.2.3 or
8.2.1.
On Feb 7, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Christian Henning wrote:
Hi there, first post. I would like to share a solution for Windows
users having problems installing PostgreSQL 8.2.2. I couldn't find
anything in the docs and FAQ.
