Re: [GENERAL] Storing and querying boolean fields

2008-01-10 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:08:16AM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > I mean this sincerely and not snidely: get another job. 7.3.20 was the last Err, 7.3.21, I meant, of course. Sorry. A ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list a

Re: [GENERAL] Storing and querying boolean fields

2008-01-10 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 06:19:40PM -0500, Brown, Richard wrote: > > - We are using PostgreSQL 7.3.4, and am locked into this version. I would > upgrade if I could, but the decision is not mine. I mean this sincerely and not snidely: get another job. 7.3.20 was the last release in the 7.3 series.

Re: [GENERAL] Storing and querying boolean fields

2008-01-09 Thread Robert Treat
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 20:09, Greg Smith wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Richard Brown wrote: > > - We are using PostgreSQL 7.3.4, and am locked into this version. I would > > upgrade if I could, but the decision is not mine. > > Just make sure you CYA so when said server eats itself the decisio

Re: [GENERAL] Storing and querying boolean fields

2008-01-09 Thread Greg Smith
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Richard Brown wrote: - We are using PostgreSQL 7.3.4, and am locked into this version. I would upgrade if I could, but the decision is not mine. Just make sure you CYA so when said server eats itself the decision maker can't point the finger at you. Give them a copy of a

Re: [GENERAL] Storing and querying boolean fields

2008-01-09 Thread Tom Lane
"Richard Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - We are using PostgreSQL 7.3.4, and am locked into this version. I would > upgrade if I could, but the decision is not mine. They won't even let you update to 7.3.something-reasonably-current ? Resign. Go find a job with a boss whose IQ is above roo