On Jan 9, 2012, at 5:07 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 09:56, Damiano ALBANI
>>> I believe DB2 is pretty much it in this area.
>>
>> For the record, it looks like MS SQL Server has some equivalent feature :
>> FILESTREAM.
>
> And Oracle has BFILE.
>
> I've actually been thinking
On 9 January 2012 12:36, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 3:07 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
>>>
>>> For the record, it looks like MS SQL Server has some equivalent feature :
>>> > FILESTREAM.
>>
>> And Oracle has BFILE.
>
> aren't these things functionally similar to PG's LO (large object) ?
Orac
On 01/09/12 3:07 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
For the record, it looks like MS SQL Server has some equivalent feature :
> FILESTREAM.
And Oracle has BFILE.
aren't these things functionally similar to PG's LO (large object) ?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz c
On 9 January 2012 09:56, Damiano ALBANI
>> I believe DB2 is pretty much it in this area.
>
> For the record, it looks like MS SQL Server has some equivalent feature :
> FILESTREAM.
And Oracle has BFILE.
I've actually been thinking about how to implement something like this
for Postgres, but the i
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 21:13, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> I'm not aware of any plans. What would be your use case?
>
Well, basically what DATALINK is made for: storing files in the filesystem
and only keeping the reference in the database.
What I'm most interested in are the "transaction" and "
On fre, 2012-01-06 at 15:53 +0100, Damiano ALBANI wrote:
> Do you plan on supporting SQL/MED features concerning DATALINKs?
> I've seen DATALINK mentionned on the Wiki [1] but I couldn't find it on the
> TODO list [2].
I'm not aware of any plans. What would be your use case?
> By the way, do you
