Re: [GENERAL] get number and names of processes connected to postgresql

2011-09-24 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/24/11 2:07 PM, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote: My apps share same databases, so no good in that. And I am very well aware of the new feature in 9.0 - but we're stuck in the 8.3 land for now. you can still give the various apps different user accounts (roles) even if they all have to have the sam

Re: [GENERAL] get number and names of processes connected to postgresql

2011-09-24 Thread Marti Raudsepp
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 00:07, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote: > My apps share same databases, so no good in that. How about different users? You can create a separate user for each application, and then GRANT them access to a single role. Regards, Marti -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-g

Re: [GENERAL] get number and names of processes connected to postgresql

2011-09-24 Thread Gregg Jaskiewicz
My apps share same databases, so no good in that. And I am very well aware of the new feature in 9.0 - but we're stuck in the 8.3 land for now. So far I managed to hack together a netstat+awk+other command line tools to get that information. (in your face - windows "server" developers/admins :P) -

Re: [GENERAL] get number and names of processes connected to postgresql

2011-09-24 Thread Marti Raudsepp
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 13:34, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote: > Basically, I got bunch of local processes connecting to postgresql, > need to aggregate some sort of report about number of connections and > its origin every so often. The pg_stat_activity system view gives you the database name (datname)