On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 13:42:12 +0200,
Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If your purpose in doing this is just to generate unique keys, you should
> >be using sequences instead.
>
> I would need 150 separate sequences, because each idsection needs its
> own, independent sequence of id
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Milos Prudek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If your purpose in doing this is just to generate unique keys, you should
>> be using sequences instead.
> I would need 150 separate sequences, because each idsection needs its
> own, independent sequence of idthread.
Wh
If your purpose in doing this is just to generate unique keys, you should
be using sequences instead.
I would need 150 separate sequences, because each idsection needs its
own, independent sequence of idthread.
Note that you probably want to lock the table before doing this or
two transactions ru
