On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> brian stone wrote:
> > I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL
> > also lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have
> > them but from my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
> >
> > I need
brian stone wrote:
> I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL
> also lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have
> them but from my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
>
> I need atomic actions across an N number of application servers. The
> goa
I never considered MySQL because I really DO need transactions. MySQL also
lacks many enterprise features we need; well they say they have them but from
my testing they are a bit under-cooked.
I need atomic actions across an N number of application servers. The goal here
is scalability, which
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 06:55 -0800, brian stone wrote:
> Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a
> postgresql database? I need an active active configuration; master-
> master with fail over. The project I am working needs to support a
> very large number of transactions
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 06:55:56AM -0800, brian stone wrote:
> Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a postgresql
> database? I need an active active configuration; master-master with fail
> over. The project I am working needs to support a very large number of
> tra
