Re: [GENERAL] problem while compiling user c functions in 7.1beta4

2001-02-22 Thread Tom Lane
hubert depesz lubaczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > sorry. my fault. i was wrong because the files were not installed in working > directory. strange. error in makefile's? No, an extremely deliberate change, which was discussed at length in the mailing lists. The default install now installs

Re: [GENERAL] problem while compiling user c functions in 7.1beta4

2001-02-22 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:24:48PM +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > Very strange indeed. > I have found that using cvsup is a very reliable way to keep the code > in order. In my experience postgresql is of ultra-superior quality and > everything just makes "out of the box". i had the same pr

Re: [GENERAL] problem while compiling user c functions in 7.1beta4

2001-02-22 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:39, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:21:12PM +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > I did a cvsup update about 12 hours ago and look:- > > 22:05:23 chris@berty:/usr/src/cvs/pgsql $ find . -name postgres.h > > ./src/include/postgres.h > > 22:16:22

Re: [GENERAL] problem while compiling user c functions in 7.1beta4

2001-02-22 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:21:12PM +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > I did a cvsup update about 12 hours ago and look:- > 22:05:23 chris@berty:/usr/src/cvs/pgsql $ find . -name postgres.h > ./src/include/postgres.h > 22:16:22 chris@berty:/usr/src/cvs/pgsql $ sorry. my fault. i was wrong becaus