Re: [GENERAL] ps output and postgres

2004-05-30 Thread Eric Ridge
On Feb 11, 2004, at 10:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: No one really has thought of that before. We could do it, though there are admin reasons for restricting that ability. If we said only superusers could change it, it wouldn't be very useful. That's a good point. It would be cool if SET could chan

Re: [GENERAL] ps output and postgres

2004-02-17 Thread Eric Ridge
On Feb 12, 2004, at 12:08 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Yes, I think that would be the only way to go, but I would like to have some other folks interested in extending the ps display before adding such a capability. Too bad nobody responded. I still think it would be a useful feature. eric

Re: [GENERAL] ps output and postgres

2004-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Eric Ridge wrote: > On Feb 12, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Well, let's see if someone else like the feature because adding it > > might > > reduce its usability as a guaranteed value for admins. > > Maybe making the ability to do this a configuration option (off by > default, of

Re: [GENERAL] ps output and postgres

2004-02-12 Thread Eric Ridge
On Feb 12, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Well, let's see if someone else like the feature because adding it might reduce its usability as a guaranteed value for admins. Maybe making the ability to do this a configuration option (off by default, of course) would make everyone happy? eri

Re: [GENERAL] ps output and postgres

2004-02-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Eric Ridge wrote: > On Feb 11, 2004, at 10:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > No one really has thought of that before. We could do it, though there > > are admin reasons for restricting that ability. If we said only > > superusers could change it, it wouldn't be very useful. > > That's a good poin