"Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I ask because it seems like "char" and char should match as type names,
> but don't.
No, they don't. char without any quotes is a SQL reserved word that
is equivalent to CHARACTER(1). "char" with quotes is not a reserved
word, by definition. For largely hi
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Ed L. wrote:
> I ask because it seems like "char" and char should match as type names,
> but don't.
Unfortunately, "char" and char are actually different types in
declarations like that AFAIK. When in quotes it refers to the postgres
single byte single character type, IIRC
