I used to do Oracle development and could choose between PLSQL and the java
alternative.
I chose PLSQL because java offerred no clear advantage, and it wasn't really
java. You
could use String, but for performance Oracle recommended some proprietary
string class.
If I'm remembering correctly, y
On 5/25/07, Marek Lewczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point, but from the other hand there are plenty of programing
languages but Java is the most popular :-) (source:
http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm).
Guess it depends on what survey you read ... there java is "also ran" ...
http://www.deda
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi,
This sounds great. Sorry for not being responsive on the pgsql-general.
I'll read up on this thread during the weekend. Short term, this is what
I think needs to be done:
1. Create a PL/Java 1.4 from current CVS. It compiles and runs with
PostgreSQL 8.2.
2. Do wha
Magnus Hagander pisze:
C and the backend you can certainly get help with from the -hackers
crowd. You'll have a harder time with the JNI stuff, I assume.
Great to hear that - what we need to do now is to sit down (I mean
Thomas Hallgren and others) on the pljava code and see where help is
need
Marek Lewczuk wrote:
> Magnus Hagander pisze:
>> Being a fan or not of the language really isn't the issue, and nobody is
>> *ignoring* the language and platform. We all know "the others" have it.
>> And we want it. But the core team (or more importantly in this case, the
>> people doing backend de
Magnus Hagander pisze:
Being a fan or not of the language really isn't the issue, and nobody is
*ignoring* the language and platform. We all know "the others" have it.
And we want it. But the core team (or more importantly in this case, the
people doing backend development, which is partially a
Marek Lewczuk wrote:
> I understand that most of PostgreSQL core team aren't fans of Java,
> however ignoring this language (most popular programing language) and
> developers that uses Java in everyday work is not advisable if we want
> to make PostgreSQL more popular. Look at competing RDBMS - Or
Thomas Hallgren pisze:
Hi,
This sounds great. Sorry for not being responsive on the pgsql-general.
I'll read up on this thread during the weekend. Short term, this is what
I think needs to be done:
1. Create a PL/Java 1.4 from current CVS. It compiles and runs with
PostgreSQL 8.2.
2. Do wha
Hi,
This sounds great. Sorry for not being responsive on the pgsql-general.
I'll read up on this thread during the weekend. Short term, this is what
I think needs to be done:
1. Create a PL/Java 1.4 from current CVS. It compiles and runs with
PostgreSQL 8.2.
2. Do whatever it takes to make P
Thomas Kellerer pisze:
Marek Lewczuk wrote on 23.05.2007 21:37:
I would like to know your opinion about pljava and its future
I have never used Java-in-the-database with any of the DBMS I have used
and I have never understood the reasoning behind it.
My personal opinion is, that it's not nee
Dave Page pisze:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Now this I agree with. I am sure postgresql hackers are happy to help
the pljava team get things where they need to be, but -hackers needs to
be focusing on releasing 8.3.
pl/java is actually one of the problems that pgInstaller is currently
facing. In a
Guy Rouillier pisze:
Nothing productive will come of a language debate; let's just say there
are things you can do with a complete programming language at your
disposal that you can't do with PL/pgsql. I use Java in the database,
Exactly - sometimes we need to write something more complicated
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Now this I agree with. I am sure postgresql hackers are happy to help
> the pljava team get things where they need to be, but -hackers needs to
> be focusing on releasing 8.3.
pl/java is actually one of the problems that pgInstaller is currently
facing. In a nutshell, if w
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
We have limited time; taking time from other
things to spend on pljava is quite likely not to be a wonderful idea.
It requires that people whose expertise *isn't* Java spend a lot of
time learning Java details.
Now this I agree with. I am sure postgresql hackers are happ
Marek Lewczuk wrote on 23.05.2007 21:37:
I would like to know your opinion about pljava and its future
I have never used Java-in-the-database with any of the DBMS I have used and I
have never understood the reasoning behind it.
My personal opinion is, that it's not needed. Most of the time th
Chris Browne wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Lewczuk) writes:
At this point in time, a much more important feature of PostgreSQL
would be for version 8.3 to be released. That process is running into
*some* problems vis-a-vis the review process.
The last that I heard, it was somewhat indeterm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Lewczuk) writes:
> Hello everyone,
> I would like to start very important (from my point of view) topic -
> the future of pljava in PostgreSQL development. Thomas Hallgren
> (creator of pljava) has made a great job setting up the project, but
> there are many things to do (
17 matches
Mail list logo
