It looks like it's been morphed into TED, the TransLattice Elastic
Database. From their FAQ[1]:
TransLattice Elastic Database (TED)
What’s the basis of TED? Did you write it from scratch?
We started TED from PostgreSQL, a very robust, open-source,
ACID-compliant, fully transactional
Instead it lists Postgres-R, which has been in koma for how long
now... Can't even remember any more.
Nope, it is actively developed and sponsored by Translattice.
Actively developed?
http://www.postgres-r.org/ lists the last entry in the column News on
the right with a date of
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
Instead it lists Postgres-R, which has been in koma for how long
now... Can't even remember any more.
Nope, it is actively developed and sponsored by Translattice.
Actively developed?
http://www.postgres-r.org/
I should have cross-posted this to pgsql-docs from the beginning, sorry
for the mistake.
For pgsql-docs readers:
The issue is that the official documentation misleadingly omits the
existence of Postgresql-XC:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/different-replication-solutions.html?
On 12/12/2013 08:18 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
2. Synchronous multi-master configuration
Now back to the original thread:
Knowing the number of forks/projects based on Postgres, maintaining a
list on a wiki list the one below is just easier for everybody:
postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.
It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like other
forks or whatever you may call it, as long as they're open-source.
You seem to not realize how many forks of Postgres there are.
I had mentioned just one.
And that one does
To be honest your request/demand expectation is quite unfair.
have you seen cross link on Suse and Red Hat and Ubuntu and SE Linux and
Debian and... (well I would need a google search for adding more here)
By far I guess PostgreSQL community documentation is the one of the most
organized doc
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.
It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like other
forks or whatever you may call it, as long as they're open-source.
You seem to not realize how many
Postgres-XC isn't PostgreSQL. Entirely different product.
Anyone can add pages to the wiki, and there's lots of information
there about things that aren't postgresql, Postgres-XC is just
one of those.
I think entirely different product is not really accurate. It isn't just
a fork, but a
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/different-replication-solutions.html?
Synchronous Multimaster Replication
*snip*
PostgreSQL does not offer this type of replication (...)
Now I compare that statement with:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Postgres-XC
Project Overview
*snip*
On Dec 10, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/different-replication-solutions.html?
Synchronous Multimaster Replication
*snip*
PostgreSQL does not offer this type of replication (...)
Now I compare that statement with:
On 12/10/2013 8:47 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
Seems to me that the editing process of the different parts of
postgresql.org somewhat lacks transactional semantics.
postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.there's other forks that
offer distributed databases, such as greenplum.
--
Seems to me that the editing process of the different parts of
postgresql.org somewhat lacks transactional semantics.
postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.
As an end-user, why would I care.
Since, besides that it's still open-source (even same license as
PostgreSQL itself...?),
Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net writes:
postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.
It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like other
forks or whatever you may call it, as long as they're open-source.
You seem to not realize how many forks of Postgres there are.
There's no
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net writes:
postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork.
It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like
other forks or whatever you may call it, as long as they're
open-source.
You seem to not realize how many
15 matches
Mail list logo
