Hi,
I am working on the G System project (BSD licenced) and we are going to
be (eventually) implementing a distributed database to hold data for the
game that (eventually) will be developed. People have (though I don't
think anyone has seriously investigated yet) suggested that we use a
grid
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 15:01, Greg Donald wrote:
when it obviously was not. The price was right and I knew going in I
wasn't getting a perfectly stable distro, but nevertheless they left me
with a broken machine on several occasions. Having a slightly faster
machine isn't worth the headaches
Hi list. I just want to send to you an sql file containing tools for audit the UPDATE
and DELETE
statements in a database by saving all the modifications made by a
network/system/database user.
I hope you find it useful
El Santi
=
Santiago Cassina
Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/27/2004 12:21 PM, Jeff Amiel wrote:
This may sound like a silly question
I am currently running 7.4.2.
I would like to upgrade to 7.4.5...
So I downloaded postgresql-7.4.5.tar.gz
ftp://ftp21.us.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql/v7.4.5/postgresql-7.4.5.tar.gz
uncompressed...
configure...
try
Ok..still no dice.
still shows 7.4.2 when I select version()...
I must surely be doing something silly here...
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 8/27/2004 12:21 PM, Jeff Amiel wrote:
This may sound like a silly question
I am currently running 7.4.2.
I would like to upgrade to 7.4.5...
So I downloaded
Jeff Amiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I downloaded postgresql-7.4.5.tar.gz
ftp://ftp21.us.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql/v7.4.5/postgresql-7.4.5.tar.gz
uncompressed...
configure...
make
make install
I run psql and it gives me the Welcome to psql 7.4.5, the PostgreSQL
interactive
Duh. I never restarted the server.
sheesh.
thanks to all.
Jeff
Doug McNaught wrote:
Did you shut down and restart the server after the upgrade? Are you
sure the new binaries went where you think they did?
-Doug
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4:
On 8/27/2004 12:44 PM, Jeff Amiel wrote:
Ok..still no dice.
still shows 7.4.2 when I select version()...
I must surely be doing something silly here...
You try to install 7.4.5 from souces over the FreeBSD Port build. The
problem is that the options to configure need to be the same. You can
Greg Stark wrote:
How do you check to see how many records, or ideally which records, are being
toasted and/or stored externally?
I don't know of a builtin way to do that from SQL, but the attached
seems to work for me.
Joe
checktoast.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
thanks for the heads up about the pg_config stuff... I wondered about
the difference.I have several boxes that were installed via ports
(which have the binaries reside in /usr/local/pgsql) and some hand
installed from the tar (which are in usr/local/bin).
At least that explains why I have
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:09:26 -0400, Joseph Shraibman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does EXECUTE solve the cached-plan business?
It re-plans the query at every run.
--
Markus Bertheau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't
Joe Conway wrote:
Greg Stark wrote:
How do you check to see how many records, or ideally which records,
are being
toasted and/or stored externally?
I don't know of a builtin way to do that from SQL, but the attached
seems to work for me.
FWIW, this version has a bit more robust type checking.
Title: RE: [GENERAL] performance of IN (subquery)
Have you thought about using existence checking: WHERE EXISTS (SELECT '1' FROM FOO2 WHERE BAZ = BAZ2)
If the index exists on BAZ2 you might get away with a quick index only check.
Duane
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Murphy
Michal Hlavac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I can't reproduce a crash here, but perhaps that's because you have not
supplied any sample data...
I attached file with data, where it fails...
Thanks. It turns out the main reason I couldn't reproduce it was
I was testing in CVS tip,
According to the docs is specifically doesn't.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/sql-prepare.html
When the PREPARE statement is executed, the specified statement is
parsed, rewritten, and planned. When an EXECUTE command is subsequently
issued, the prepared statement need only be
Jeremy Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My questions are:
1) How can #3 take 30 times as long as #2, given that in my databse they
have the exact same number of rows returned and are drawn from the exact
same tables?
2) How is it possible for #3, a subset of #1 with a very simple WHERE
Joseph Shraibman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Markus Bertheau wrote:
It re-plans the query at every run.
According to the docs is specifically doesn't.
You're confusing SQL EXECUTE statement with the quite different plpgsql
EXECUTE statement ...
regards, tom lane
Paul Tillotson wrote:
If pgautovacuum does ANALYZE and we can get most people to use
pgautovacuum, I think this problem will go away.
It does. We won't get most people to use it for 8.0 since it is still a
contrib project, but hopefully it will be built-in for 8.1.
Dear all,
I have this problem with getting information out of my
database and I don't know if it is my knowledge of sql
or that this is something that can't be done in sql.
I have the following table:
id fdateprod pricestat nr_items sdate
x1 23-11-2003123 456 yes
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not about to run analyze in the middle of the data generation
(which wouldn't work anyways since it's in a transaction).
Since 7.3 or 7.4, you *can* run ANALYZE in the middle of a transaction.
The cached-plan
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know of a builtin way to do that from SQL, but the attached seems to
work for me.
Cool. Thank you.
--
greg
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister
I'm about to try to implement a simple pg_autovacuum script that can be
used in conjunction with or integrated entirely with the contrib
start-scripts for postgres. I just want to check that what I'm doing
has the appropriate sanity checks.
The behavior I'm considering is:
if pg_ctl status
Maybe I've missed it but can someone plese help me
with this?
Brgds and thanks in advance,
--- Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm new to PostgreSQL and am busy tring to work with
it. Of pl/pgsql I know even less and that's the part
I
have a question on right now. I have this
CM == Carlos Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CM Ok, now I'm really intrigued by what looks to me
CM (possibly from a naive point of view) like a bug,
CM or rather, a limitation on the implementation.
[[ ... ]]
CM I don't know about the internals of how transactions
CM and locks and FK
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's orthogonal. My point was that I have a bigger problem, but even if I
address it by switching away from plpgsql, or I guess by using EXECUTE, I
would still have a problem. I didn't realize you could run analyze in a
transaction, but even being able to I
SS == Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SS If transaction 1 inserts a child row that references row A, then
SS transaction 2 does a child row that references row B and they both then go
SS to do child rows that reference the other, in the current implementation,
SS there's no way to change
26 matches
Mail list logo
