On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 16:50:59 -0700,
Kevin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example
>
> filename date revision
> file110/05/06 1
> file110/05/07 2
> file210/05/08 1
>
> I want to do a query that will return the greatest date for each
> unique filename
If the revisi
Not sure this is the right answer: in older version you could enable
it via the postgresql.conf file, modifing the variable log_statement
and setting that to true. Also, you should check the syslog level
variable in the same file.
Regards
Marco
On 6/17/06, Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Is there a way to send and read binary data directly from memory,
without escaping characters, for SELECT and INSERT queries?
This is for a file repository, such as in source control.
I saw in the manual the section on bytea and binary data, but I don't
want to go through hundreds of megabytes
Kevin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to send and read binary data directly from memory,
> without escaping characters, for SELECT and INSERT queries?
See PQexecParams --- an out-of-line bytea parameter, transmitted in
binary format, seems to be what you want on the send side
Greg Quinn wrote:
1.) I went to the OpenSSL ste, and tried to download opnSSL, but I
only saw Linux files. Is OpenSSL supported ni Windows?
http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html
2.) I am using the Npgsql.NET data provider to connect, but it
doesn’t support SSL yet, when will
Hello everyone -
Array columns are, by default, 1-offset in their
subscripting. Since I usually call postgres
from a language with zero-offset, I would prefer
that postgres conform to that. The online
documentation hints that this may be configurable
but I haven't been able to find how this is
Erin Sheldon wrote:
Hello everyone -
Array columns are, by default, 1-offset in their
subscripting. Since I usually call postgres
from a language with zero-offset, I would prefer
that postgres conform to that. The online
documentation hints that this may be configurable
but I haven't been able
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
>
> ExecutorState: 550339936 total in 123 blocks; 195005920 free (740144
chunks); 355334016 used
> ...
> HashBatchContext: 293593176 total in 44 blocks; 3107384 free (80 chunks);
290485792 used
> TIDBitmap: 2088960 total in 8 blocks; 1012120 free (27 ch
Greg Quinn wrote:
1.) I went to the OpenSSL ste, and tried to download opnSSL, but I
only saw Linux files. Is OpenSSL supported ni Windows?
2.) I am using the Npgsql.NET data provider to connect, but it
doesn’t support SSL yet, when will it support SSL?
Thanks
Yes, it works o
"Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ExecutorState: 550339936 total in 123 blocks; 195005920 free (740144
>> chunks); 355334016 used
>> ...
>> HashBatchContext: 293593176 total in 44 blocks; 3107384 free (80 chunks);
>> 290485792 used
> Er, looks like a huge hash-join but not sure if it
Is there a way to add a foreign key constraint without having to wait for it
to check the consistency of all existing records? If a database is being
reloaded (pg_dumpall then load), it really shouldn't be necessary to check
the referential integrity - or at least I should be able to stipulate tha
""Linux Portal"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> The article on the subject can be read here:
>
> http://linux.inet.hr/optimize_postgresql_database_size.html
>
After dump/restore the database size is 1685 MB and after
vacuum-full/reindex is 1990 MB. Where we saved 305 MB?
Regards,
Qingqing
Wes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My database reload is currently taking about 6 hours to load the data, 42
> hours to reindex, and about another 40 hours or so to check the foreign key
> constraints (about 1.2 billion rows).
What PG version is this, and what have you got maintenance_work_mem set
On 6/18/06 10:48 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My database reload is currently taking about 6 hours to load the data, 42
>> hours to reindex, and about another 40 hours or so to check the foreign key
>> constraints (about 1.2 billion rows).
>
> What PG version is this, and what hav
14 matches
Mail list logo